Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['Taraf']
Date: 2008-08-10

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı displays a high level of consistency in his critique of the LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk) ortasınıfları. Throughout the column, he maintains a focus on the paradoxes and contradictions within this group. - Emotionality: Kütahyalı's writing can be described as provocative rather than calm. He uses strong language to criticize the LAST ortasınıfları, describing them as being in a “zihinsel bunalım” (mental crisis) and having a “faşizan ruh hali” (fascist mindset). - Credibility: His analysis is largely fact-based, drawing from personal observations and experiences, such as the dynamics within his own family and neighborhood. However, some statements, like the characterization of LAST ortasınıfları as “kaybeden” (losers), could be seen as hyperbolic.

Affiliations: - LAST ortasınıfları: Kütahyalı appears to be critical of this group, suggesting they are in a state of mental crisis and ideological rigidity. - AKP: He mentions the economic benefits that LAST ortasınıfları gain from AKP policies, yet they do not vote for AKP due to identity-related reasons. - Taraf gazetesi: Kütahyalı writes for Taraf, and he mentions that the newspaper is seen as a “heretic” symbol by the LAST ortasınıfları, especially after the Ergenekon process. - Gökhan Özgün: He references Gökhan Özgün, another writer for Taraf, and shares an anecdote about Özgün's personal experience with social ostracism. - CUMOK (Cumhuriyet okuru): Kütahyalı introduces this term to describe a group of families who read Cumhuriyet newspaper, suggesting a type of community solidarity. - Doğan medyası: He mentions that the central media, such as Doğan media, was previously preferred by his relatives, indicating a shift in their media consumption. - ABD: He notes that the USA has become a symbol of hatred for these families, yet they desire their children to study there, highlighting a paradox.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that criticizes the ideological rigidity and paradoxes of the LAST ortasınıfları. He highlights their economic benefits from AKP policies yet their refusal to support the party due to identity issues. - He also seems to be advocating for a more open-minded and globally integrated perspective, as evidenced by his comments on the children of these families becoming more “refined” and less “Kemalist” through international education. - There is a possible intention to highlight the social dynamics and pressures within Turkish society, using personal anecdotes to illustrate broader societal issues.

Trustworthiness: - Kütahyalı's column is based on personal observations and experiences, which lends a level of authenticity to his narrative. However, the provocative tone and some hyperbolic statements might reduce the perceived objectivity. - His agenda to critique a specific group could be seen as biased, yet the detailed analysis and personal stories suggest a genuine attempt to shed light on social phenomena.