Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['Taraf']
Date: 2008-08-10

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a high level of consistency in his critique of the LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk) middle class. He consistently portrays them as struggling with a paradoxical identity crisis while benefiting from AKP's economic policies. - Emotionality: The tone of the column is moderately provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to describe the “fascist mentality” and “mental crisis” of the LAST middle class, which may provoke readers. However, he also provides personal anecdotes that add a layer of empathy and relatability, balancing the overall emotionality. - Credibility: The credibility of the column is mixed. Kütahyalı's arguments are supported by personal anecdotes and observations, which add a level of authenticity. However, some claims, like the psychological state of the LAST middle class, may be seen as hyperbolic without more empirical evidence. His use of invented terms like “CUMOK” (Cumhuriyet okuru) might be seen as satirical or dismissive, which could affect his credibility.

- LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk): Kütahyalı criticizes the LAST middle class for their perceived ideological rigidity and resistance to democratic change despite their economic gains. He suggests they are in a mental crisis and are irrationally clinging to their identity. - AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi): The column implies a positive view towards AKP's economic policies, which are said to benefit the LAST middle class despite their political opposition. - Taraf: Kütahyalı writes for Taraf, and the column reflects a possible alignment with the newspaper's critical stance towards the establishment and its support for more democratic reforms. - Gökhan Özgün: Mentioned as another writer for Taraf, indicating a possible professional relationship or shared perspective. - CUMOK (Cumhuriyet okuru): Kütahyalı introduces this term to describe a group that he perceives as dogmatically aligned with the Cumhuriyet newspaper, indicating a negative view towards this group. - Doğan Medyası: Mentioned as a past media preference of the LAST middle class, suggesting a possible shift in media consumption patterns. - ABD (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri): Mentioned as a paradoxical symbol of hatred and aspiration for the LAST middle class, indicating a complex relationship. - Ergenekon: Referenced in the context of Taraf's coverage, suggesting a critical stance towards the Ergenekon case and its implications.

- Agenda: Kütahyalı seems to be pushing a narrative that critiques the ideological rigidity of the LAST middle class and highlights their paradoxical behavior. He also appears to support the idea of generational change and the influence of global education on young people's perspectives. The column may be seen as advocating for a more open and democratic society. - Trustworthiness: The trustworthiness of the column is moderate. While Kütahyalı provides personal anecdotes and observations, the column lacks extensive data or empirical evidence to fully support his claims. The use of provocative language and invented terms could also be seen as attempts to sway the reader's emotions rather than purely objective reporting.