This is an old revision of the document!
Resource
Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['Taraf']
Date: 2008-08-10
Analysis
Character Analysis
Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a high level of consistency in its critique of the LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk) middle class. He consistently portrays them as being in a state of ideological crisis and clinging to their established identities. - Emotionality: The tone of the column is provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to describe the LAST middle class as “fascist” and “bigoted,” which suggests a high level of emotionality and a desire to provoke thought or reaction. - Credibility: The column is fact-based to some extent, as it references real social phenomena and personal anecdotes. However, it also contains hyperbolic elements, such as the characterization of the LAST middle class's mindset as “fascist.” This suggests a moderate level of credibility, as the author blends factual observations with strong opinions.
Relationships with Entities
Affiliations: - LAST Ortasınıfları: Kütahyalı's portrayal of the LAST middle class is highly critical. He suggests they are in a state of ideological crisis and are becoming more bigoted. - AKP: The column implies a positive view of the AKP's economic policies, noting that they have benefited the LAST middle class economically. However, he also highlights the social pressure against supporting AKP. - Taraf Gazetesi: Kütahyalı positions Taraf as a symbol of opposition to the mainstream, “heretic” in the eyes of the LAST middle class, especially after the Ergenekon process. - CUMOK (Cumhuriyet Okuru): He introduces CUMOK as a type of community solidarity organization, suggesting a critical view of this group as part of the broader LAST middle class. - Gökhan Özgün: Mentioned as a fellow writer at Taraf, whose personal experiences are used to illustrate the social pressures faced by those who support or write for Taraf. - Doğan Medyası: Referenced as the type of media traditionally consumed by the LAST middle class, suggesting a possible critique of mainstream media influence. - ABD (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri): Mentioned as a paradoxical symbol of hatred for the LAST middle class, yet a desired destination for their children's education.
Intentions (Trustworthiness)
Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that critiques the ideological rigidity and social pressures within the LAST middle class. He highlights the paradox of their economic support for AKP policies while socially opposing them. - He also seems to be advocating for a more open and less ideologically constrained worldview, as evidenced by his discussion of the children of the LAST middle class who change their views after exposure to international education and social sciences.
Objectivity: - The column is not purely objective reporting. Kütahyalı's strong language and personal anecdotes suggest a subjective perspective aimed at critiquing and possibly changing the views of his readers.