This is an old revision of the document!
Resource
Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: [“LAST'ların”, 'trajedisi']
Date: 2008-08-13
Analysis
Character Analysis:
Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's writing shows a high level of consistency in critiquing the LAST (Laik, Alevi, Sunni, Türk) middle class. He consistently portrays them as struggling with their identity and values in the face of changing societal dynamics. - Emotionality: The tone of the column is highly emotional and provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to describe the psychological state and perceived hypocrisy of the LAST middle class, often evoking a sense of urgency and crisis. - Credibility: The column is more opinion-based than fact-based, with Kütahyalı making broad generalizations about the LAST middle class and their attitudes towards non-Muslims. While he does not provide specific data or examples, his arguments are rooted in a narrative that suggests a deep understanding of the societal shifts in Turkey.
Relationships with Entities:
Affiliations: - LAST Ortasınıfları: Kütahyalı's column suggests a critical stance towards the LAST middle class, portraying them as undergoing a significant identity crisis and shifting attitudes towards non-Muslims. - Gayrimüslimler: The column discusses the changing relationship between the LAST middle class and non-Muslims, suggesting a historical alliance that has turned into hostility. - Kemalizm: Kütahyalı critiques the LAST middle class's adherence to Kemalism, suggesting it is no longer seen as the sole carrier of modernity. - AKP Elitleri: There is a mention of AKP elites being accused of being Jewish, indicating a possible critique of conspiracy theories circulating among the LAST middle class. - Radikal Sağ: The column suggests that radical right-wing sentiments have influenced the LAST middle class's views on non-Muslims.
Intentions (Trustworthiness):
Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that critiques the LAST middle class's perceived hypocrisy and identity crisis. He highlights their shifting attitudes towards non-Muslims as a symptom of broader societal changes. - The column may also aim to provoke a discussion on the changing dynamics of Turkish society, particularly regarding the role of Kemalism and the integration of non-Muslims.
Objectivity: - The column is not purely objective reporting but rather a critical essay that uses strong opinions to make its points. Kütahyalı's narrative is driven by his perspective on the societal shifts in Turkey, which may not be universally accepted.
Summary graph
