Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['“Vatan', 'sağolsun”']
Date: 2008-08-17

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a high level of consistency in its critique of the societal response to the ongoing conflict and the attitudes of the LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk) middle class. He consistently portrays a critical stance towards the nationalistic rhetoric and the lack of resolution in the conflict. - Emotionality: The column is emotionally charged, with a tone that could be described as provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to evoke empathy and frustration, especially when discussing the deaths of young soldiers and the reactions of their families. He does not shy away from using emotionally loaded terms like “kan kırmızısı” (blood red) to emphasize the gravity of the situation. - Credibility: Kütahyalı's writing appears to be fact-based, as he references real events and quotes from individuals, such as the mother who lost her son and did not say “Vatan sağolsun.” However, the column also employs some hyperbolic elements to drive home his points, which may affect perceived credibility.

Affiliations: - LAST (Laik yaşam tarzına sahip Sünni Türk): Kütahyalı criticizes the LAST middle class for their nationalistic yet contradictory stance on the conflict. He suggests a possible disillusionment among this group, particularly regarding their willingness to send their own children to fight. - Kemalist/ulusalcı (Kemalist/nationalist): He mentions that people identifying as Kemalist or nationalist in a summer environment agreed with the sentiments of the mother who lost her son, indicating a possible rift or dissatisfaction within these groups. - Taraf journal: As the platform publishing Kütahyalı's column, it is suggested that there might be an alignment with the journal's editorial stance on critiquing societal and political issues.

Public or Hidden Figures: - The mother who lost her son: Kütahyalı references a specific case where a mother did not say “Vatan sağolsun” and openly criticized the state and military. This figure is used to illustrate broader sentiments among certain segments of society. - The journalist friend: Mentioned as having contacted the aforementioned mother, indicating a network of journalists possibly aligned with Kütahyalı's views.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı seems to be pushing a narrative that critiques the nationalistic rhetoric and the societal acceptance of ongoing conflict without resolution. He highlights the contradictions within the LAST middle class and the broader societal attitudes towards the conflict. - There is a suggestion that he is advocating for a more critical and possibly peaceful approach to resolving the conflict, as he mentions the lack of calls for a political solution among the LAST.

Trustworthiness: - The column appears to be driven by a personal agenda to critique and possibly influence public opinion on the conflict. While Kütahyalı uses real events and quotes, his provocative style and focus on specific narratives might suggest a lower level of objectivity. The intent to provoke thought and possibly action towards a political solution could be inferred, but the overall trust level might be moderate due to the emotional and narrative-driven approach.