Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-01-26

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column displays a high level of consistency in terms of the narrative it pushes. Throughout the article, the focus remains on the alleged connections between the Ergenekon organization and the assassination of Hrant Dink, consistently using official documents and court testimonies as evidence. - Emotionality: The tone of the column can be described as provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language and direct accusations, which might stir emotional reactions among readers. However, there is also an element of calmness in the structured presentation of evidence. - Credibility: The credibility of the column leans towards being fact-based, as it relies heavily on official documents and court-related information. However, the hyperbolic nature of some claims, such as direct accusations without full corroboration, might reduce perceived credibility.

Affiliations: - Ergenekon: The column suggests a strong negative affiliation with Ergenekon, portraying it as a criminal organization responsible for the assassination of Hrant Dink. The narrative consistently points to Ergenekon's involvement in various plots and crimes. - Hrant Dink: There is a positive affiliation suggested towards Hrant Dink, as the column aims to shed light on his assassination and the possible culprits, potentially aligning with efforts to seek justice for him. - Sevgi Erenerol: The column presents a negative view of Sevgi Erenerol, an Ergenekon suspect, by detailing her alleged involvement in missionary-related activities and seminars. - Veli Küçük, Levent Göktaş, Levent Temiz, Kemal Kerinçsiz: These individuals are mentioned as Ergenekon suspects allegedly connected to the Dink assassination, indicating a negative portrayal. - Fuar Ermiş: The column suggests a negative affiliation with Fuar Ermiş, an Ergenekon suspect, due to his alleged involvement in spreading organizational messages through writing. - Ergun Poyraz: There is a negative portrayal of Ergun Poyraz, another Ergenekon suspect, linked to missionary-related activities and court lobbying.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that connects the Ergenekon organization directly to the assassination of Hrant Dink. The column aims to highlight and possibly influence public perception regarding the involvement of Ergenekon in this crime. - There seems to be an agenda to expose alleged criminal activities of Ergenekon members and their broader impact on societal peace and stability.

Trustworthiness: - The column's reliance on official documents and court testimonies suggests a moderate level of trustworthiness. However, the provocative tone and the selective presentation of information might undermine this trust, as it could be perceived as an attempt to sway public opinion rather than purely report facts.