Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-01-26

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column demonstrates a consistent focus on the links between the Hrant Dink assassination and the Ergenekon organization. The column consistently refers to official documents and court testimonies to support the narrative. - Emotionality: The column can be described as moderately provocative. The author uses strong language to imply connections between various figures and the Ergenekon organization, which could be seen as inflammatory. However, the tone remains relatively calm and does not veer into overtly sensationalist territory. - Credibility: The credibility of the column is bolstered by references to specific legal documents and court cases. However, the use of phrases like “Ergenekon tarafından kirli bir örgütsel ağla işlendiğinin kanıtlarına” suggests a hyperbolic style that may undermine the fact-based approach. The column relies heavily on allegations and claims made in legal documents, which, while official, are still subject to legal scrutiny and may not be conclusive evidence.

Affiliations: - Ergenekon: The column suggests a strong negative association with Ergenekon, portraying it as a criminal organization responsible for the Hrant Dink assassination and other crimes. - Kafes Eylem Planı: The column references this plan as part of the Ergenekon investigation, suggesting a negative association with it as a tool used by Ergenekon. - Sevgi Erenerol: The column mentions Erenerol as an Ergenekon suspect, suggesting a negative association due to her involvement in seminars about missionaries and minorities. - Veli Küçük, Levent Göktaş, Levent Temiz, Kemal Kerinçsiz: These individuals are mentioned as Ergenekon suspects linked to the Hrant Dink assassination, suggesting a negative association. - Fuar Ermiş: The column portrays Ermiş as an Ergenekon suspect who published writings without fully reading them, suggesting a negative association due to his alleged role in spreading Ergenekon's messages. - Ergun Poyraz: The column suggests a negative association with Poyraz, alleging his involvement in influencing judicial outcomes related to missionary cases.

Agenda: - The column appears to push a narrative that the Hrant Dink assassination was part of a larger conspiracy orchestrated by Ergenekon. The author uses legal documents and court testimonies to support this narrative, but the selective focus on certain aspects and the use of strong language suggest an agenda to highlight Ergenekon's alleged role in the assassination. - There is a possible intention to influence public opinion about Ergenekon and its alleged criminal activities, emphasizing the organization's role in creating chaos and instability in Turkey.

Trustworthiness: - The column's reliance on legal documents and court cases provides a level of trustworthiness, but the selective presentation of information and the provocative language used suggest a moderate level of trust. The author's intent to push a specific narrative about Ergenekon's role in the Hrant Dink assassination may bias the reporting.