Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-01-26

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's writing in this column appears to be consistent in its focus on presenting evidence related to the Ergenekon organization and its alleged involvement in the Hrant Dink assassination. The narrative follows a clear thread of connecting different pieces of evidence to build a case. - Emotionality: The column is relatively calm and factual, focusing on presenting evidence rather than stirring emotions. There are no overtly provocative statements; instead, the tone is investigative and serious. - Credibility: The column's credibility leans towards being fact-based, as it relies on references to official documents and court testimonies. However, the use of terms like “dirty organizational network” might suggest a slight hyperbolic tone, though it is within the context of serious allegations.

Affiliations: - Ergenekon: The column extensively discusses the alleged involvement of Ergenekon in the Hrant Dink assassination. It references various individuals associated with Ergenekon, such as Sevgi Erenerol, Veli Küçük, Levent Göktaş, Levent Temiz, Kemal Kerinçsiz, Fuar Ermiş, and Ergun Poyraz. The narrative suggests a possible negative view of Ergenekon as a criminal organization. - Kuvva-i Milliye Derneği: Mentioned in relation to Fuar Ermiş, suggesting a possible affiliation with Ergenekon through this group. - Genelkurmay Başkanlığı and Hava Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı: These entities are mentioned in the context of Sevgi Erenerol's seminars, suggesting a possible connection to military institutions. - Yargıtay: Mentioned in relation to Ergun Poyraz's activities, suggesting a possible connection to the judicial system. - Alman Vakıfları: Referenced in the context of Ergun Poyraz's involvement, suggesting a possible connection to foreign entities.

Agenda: - The column appears to be pushing a narrative that connects the Hrant Dink assassination to a broader conspiracy involving Ergenekon. This narrative is supported by references to official documents and court testimonies, suggesting an intent to expose or highlight the alleged criminal activities of Ergenekon. - There is a possible agenda to influence public opinion about the Ergenekon trials and the Hrant Dink case, emphasizing the need for further investigation and accountability.

Trustworthiness: - The column's reliance on official documents and court testimonies lends a degree of credibility to the claims made. However, the selective presentation of evidence and the framing of Ergenekon as a “dirty organizational network” may suggest a biased perspective. - The column's trustworthiness can be rated as moderate, as it presents evidence but also frames it within a specific narrative.