Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-01-26

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı demonstrates a high level of consistency in his reporting on the Ergenekon case and its alleged connection to the Hrant Dink assassination. The column continues a series of reports, indicating a sustained focus on this topic. - Emotionality: The tone of the article is more on the provocative side. The use of phrases like “Ergenekon tarafından kirli bir örgütsel ağla işlendiği” (committed by Ergenekon through a dirty organizational network) suggests a strong emotional stance against the group. - Credibility: The column is largely fact-based, relying on official documents and court testimonies. However, the author's use of strong language and the selective presentation of evidence could be perceived as hyperbolic, potentially affecting the perceived credibility.

Affiliations: - Ergenekon: The column suggests a negative stance towards Ergenekon, portraying it as a criminal organization involved in the assassination of Hrant Dink and other incidents. The author mentions various Ergenekon defendants, such as Sevgi Erenerol, Veli Küçük, Levent Göktaş, Levent Temiz, Kemal Kerinçsiz, Fuat Ermiş, and Ergun Poyraz, implicating them in the conspiracy. - Kuvva-i Milliye Derneği: Mentioned in relation to Fuat Ermiş, suggesting a possible link to Ergenekon's activities. - Genelkurmay Başkanlığı ve Hava Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı: These military entities are mentioned in the context of Sevgi Erenerol's seminars, suggesting a possible connection to Ergenekon's activities. - Yargıtay: Referenced in the context of Ergun Poyraz's alleged lobbying efforts, suggesting a possible influence or manipulation within the judiciary.

Agenda: - The author appears to be pushing a narrative that Ergenekon was responsible for the Hrant Dink assassination and other similar incidents, aiming to create chaos and prepare the ground for a coup. This is evident from the detailed references to official documents and court testimonies. - The column may also be intended to keep public attention on the Ergenekon case and its alleged crimes, potentially influencing public opinion against the organization and its affiliates.

Trustworthiness: - The reliance on official documents and court testimonies lends a degree of credibility to the column. However, the strong language and selective presentation of evidence may suggest a bias, which could impact the perceived trustworthiness of the report.