Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-01-26

Traits: - Consistency: The author, Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı, shows a high level of consistency in his narrative throughout the column. He maintains a focus on the Ergenekon organization's alleged involvement in the Hrant Dink assassination and related events, consistently citing official documents and legal proceedings to support his claims. - Emotionality: The tone of the column is provocative, as it aims to stir public opinion against the Ergenekon organization by highlighting their alleged criminal activities. The use of phrases like “kirli bir örgütsel ağ” (a dirty organizational network) indicates a strong emotional charge. - Credibility: The column appears to be fact-based, as it relies on excerpts from official documents and court proceedings such as the Kafes Eylem Planı and Ergenekon indictments. However, the author's strong language and the selective presentation of information may suggest a degree of hyperbole.

Affiliations: - Ergenekon: The column suggests a strong negative affiliation with the Ergenekon organization, portraying it as responsible for the assassination of Hrant Dink and other criminal activities. - Kafes Eylem Planı: The column references the Kafes Eylem Planı as a key document linking Ergenekon to the assassination, indicating a possible investigative or adversarial relationship. - Sevgi Erenerol: Mentioned as an Ergenekon defendant who gave seminars on missionary activities, suggesting a possible link to the organization's operations. - Veli Küçük, Levent Göktaş, Levent Temiz, Kemal Kerinçsiz: These individuals are mentioned as Ergenekon defendants allegedly connected to the Dink assassination, indicating a possible negative relationship. - Fuar Ermiş: Described as an Ergenekon defendant who wrote articles without reading them, suggesting a possible manipulated or coerced relationship within the organization. - Ergun Poyraz: Mentioned as an Ergenekon defendant involved in lobbying efforts related to missionary cases, suggesting a possible strategic or manipulative relationship within the organization.

Agenda: - The column appears to be pushing a narrative that the Ergenekon organization was behind the assassination of Hrant Dink and other similar incidents. This is supported by the author's repeated references to official documents and court proceedings. - The author may be attempting to influence public opinion against Ergenekon and highlight the need for further investigation into their activities.

Trustworthiness: - The reliance on official documents and court proceedings lends a degree of credibility to the column. However, the strong language and the selective presentation of information may suggest a bias against Ergenekon, which could impact the perceived objectivity of the reporting.