Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-02-03

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's writing exhibits a high degree of consistency in critiquing the “Eski Türkiye” (Old Turkey) and advocating for “Yeni Türkiye” (New Turkey). His arguments against the educational system and its ideological underpinnings are consistently presented throughout the column. - Emotionality: The column is highly emotional and provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language such as “maskara haline gelişini” (turning into a clown) and “diz çöküşünü” (kneeling down) to criticize the media and educational figures aligned with the old regime. His tone is far from calm, aiming to stir emotions and rally support for his vision of New Turkey. - Credibility: The credibility of Kütahyalı's arguments can be seen as mixed. While he references specific events and documents, such as the Balyoz darbe planları (Sledgehammer coup plans) and Ergenekon soruşturmaları (Ergenekon investigations), his hyperbolic language and strong ideological stance may undermine his fact-based reporting. His critique of Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp tarihi dersleri (Atatürk's Principles and Revolution History courses) and the Andımız (Oath of Allegiance) is laden with ideological bias.

Affiliations: - Yeni Türkiye: Kütahyalı positions himself as a supporter of New Turkey, advocating for its vision and critiquing those who oppose it. - Eski Türkiye: He is highly critical of the old regime, particularly its media and educational system. - Özgür Eğit-Sen: He mentions the organization positively, citing its leader Yusuf Tanrıverdi's statements to support his arguments. - Muvazzaf subaylar (Active-duty officers) and MGD (Military Staff College): These are portrayed negatively as agents of military intervention and ideological indoctrination in schools. - Ergenekon and Balyoz: These are referenced as evidence of military overreach and ideological manipulation. - Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp tarihi dersleri: The courses are criticized heavily as tools of Kemalist indoctrination. - Andımız: He advocates for its removal, likening it to fascist practices in Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative in favor of New Turkey, which involves a significant overhaul of the educational system and a rejection of what he perceives as Kemalist indoctrination. His column can be seen as part of a broader effort to shift public opinion and policy towards this new vision. - His critique of the old regime's media and educational system suggests an agenda to discredit these institutions and replace them with ones aligned with New Turkey's values. - The mention of specific legal cases, such as the one against Yusuf Tanrıverdi, indicates an intent to highlight perceived injustices and rally support for those who challenge the status quo.

Trustworthiness: - The trustworthiness of Kütahyalı's column is moderate. While he does reference real events and legal cases, his highly emotional and ideologically charged language may reduce the perceived objectivity of his reporting. His agenda to promote New Turkey is clear, which may influence readers to question his impartiality.