Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Takvim
Title: []
Date: 2012-02-03

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a high level of consistency in his critique of the existing educational system and his advocacy for a “Yeni Türkiye” (New Turkey). He consistently portrays the old system as flawed and in need of reform. - Emotionality: The column is highly emotional and provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to criticize the “Eski Türkiye” (Old Turkey) and its educational policies, describing them as backward and oppressive. His use of phrases like “maskara haline gelişini” (turning into a clown) and “diz çöküşünü” (kneeling down) reflects a combative tone. - Credibility: The credibility of the column can be questioned due to its hyperbolic nature and the lack of concrete evidence to support some of his claims. Kütahyalı makes broad statements about the educational system and its impact on society without providing detailed data or citations. However, he does reference specific events and figures, such as the Ergenekon and Balyoz investigations, which lend some credibility to his narrative.

Affiliations: - Yeni Türkiye: Kütahyalı appears to be strongly affiliated with the concept of “Yeni Türkiye,” suggesting a positive relationship with this ideological framework. He advocates for its values and criticizes those who do not align with it. - Eski Türkiye: There is a clear negative relationship with “Eski Türkiye” and its associated media and educational systems. Kütahyalı portrays these entities as outdated and harmful. - Özgür Eğit-Sen: Kütahyalı mentions Özgür Eğit-Sen and its leader Yusuf Tanrıverdi, suggesting a possible alignment with this group's views on education and ideology. The mention of legal action against Tanrıverdi indicates a shared critique of the military's role in education. - Ergenekon and Balyoz: Kütahyalı references these investigations in a way that suggests he supports the findings that implicate military involvement in education and politics, indicating a possible positive relationship with the outcomes of these investigations. - Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi: Kütahyalı criticizes this course and its content, suggesting a negative relationship with the educational framework that promotes Kemalist ideology.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that supports the transformation of Turkey into “Yeni Türkiye.” His critique of the existing educational system and its ideological underpinnings suggests an agenda to reform or replace these systems with ones that align more closely with his vision of a new Turkey. - There is a clear agenda to discredit and dismantle the influence of “Eski Türkiye,” particularly its educational policies and military involvement in education. - Kütahyalı's mention of specific legal cases and investigations suggests an agenda to highlight and possibly exaggerate the perceived injustices and ideological indoctrination within the educational system.

Trustworthiness: - The trustworthiness of Kütahyalı's column is moderate. While he references real events and figures, his hyperbolic language and lack of detailed evidence can undermine his credibility. His strong emotional tone and clear agenda suggest a biased perspective, which may influence the reader's perception of his objectivity.