Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['Müslümanlar', 've']
Date: 2008-08-20

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a high level of consistency in addressing the issues of death and conflict in the Southeast of Turkey. His focus remains on the human aspect of the conflict, emphasizing the impact on families and communities, and he consistently critiques the state's language and approach towards the conflict. - Emotionality: The column is highly emotional and provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to criticize the state's media and the way it reports on deaths, calling it “vicdansız dil” (heartless language). He also expresses deep empathy for the families affected by the conflict, which adds to the emotional tone. - Credibility: Kütahyalı's credibility appears to be based on a mix of personal observations and broader social commentary. He uses examples and anecdotes to support his arguments, but also employs hyperbolic language when critiquing state narratives. His references to Etyen Mahçupyan and the mention of LAST ortasınıf (middle class) suggest a fact-based approach, though his strong opinions might lead readers to question his objectivity.

Affiliations: - PKK: Kütahyalı suggests a critical view of the PKK, yet he also criticizes the state's language towards PKK members, indicating a nuanced perspective that does not align fully with either side. - Türk Devleti (Turkish State): He is highly critical of the Turkish state's approach and language regarding the conflict, suggesting a possible alignment with those who oppose the state's current policies. - TSK (Turkish Armed Forces): Kütahyalı calls for the TSK's upper echelons to evaluate their approach, indicating a critical stance towards the military's handling of the conflict. - Etyen Mahçupyan: He references Mahçupyan positively, suggesting an alignment or at least a respect for Mahçupyan's views on the Ergenekon and PKK. - LAST Ortasınıf (Middle Class): Kütahyalı uses the term to describe a segment of society whose reactions to the conflict he discusses, suggesting a focus on their socio-political attitudes. - Geleneksel-Dindar Yurttaşlar (Traditional-Religious Citizens): He discusses their views on death and conflict, indicating a nuanced understanding and possibly a sympathetic stance towards their perspective. - İslami Camia (Islamic Community): Kütahyalı critiques the secularization of the Islamic middle class, suggesting a critical view of their evolving attitudes.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that critiques the state's handling of the conflict in the Southeast, highlighting the human cost and the insensitivity of official narratives. - He may be advocating for a more empathetic and nuanced approach to the conflict, suggesting that the current state rhetoric is counterproductive. - There is a possible agenda to highlight the socio-political dynamics between different classes and ideological groups within Turkey, particularly focusing on the LAST ortasınıf and the İslami camia.

Trustworthiness: - The column's strong emotional tone and provocative language might suggest a lower level of trust in terms of objective reporting. However, the references to specific individuals and social groups, along with the detailed discussion of societal attitudes, suggest a moderate level of trust in his intent to shed light on complex issues.