Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: ['Müslümanlar', 've']
Date: 2008-08-20

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's writing shows a high level of consistency in terms of his critical stance towards the state's handling of the conflict and the use of language in reporting casualties. He consistently critiques the state's narrative and the media's role in it. - Emotionality: The column is highly emotional and provocative. Kütahyalı uses strong language to criticize the state's approach, describing the media's reporting style as “provocative” and “vile.” He appeals to the reader's emotions by discussing the impact of the conflict on families and the moral implications of the language used. - Credibility: The credibility of the column can be assessed as fact-based, as Kütahyalı references specific incidents and quotes from individuals affected by the conflict. However, his use of hyperbolic language and strong opinions may lead some readers to question the objectivity of his reporting.

Affiliations: - PKK: Kütahyalı mentions the PKK and criticizes the state's approach towards them, suggesting that the state's language benefits the PKK. He does not align himself with the PKK but rather critiques the state's narrative. - TSK (Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri): He criticizes the upper echelons of the TSK for not properly evaluating the situation and the impact of their language on public perception. - Ergenekon: Kütahyalı references Etyen Mahçupyan's writing about the Ergenekon and PKK sharing similar interests, suggesting a critical view of this alignment. - LAST (Lise ve Altı Sınıf): He discusses the attitudes of LAST middle-class families towards the conflict, showing a nuanced understanding of their perspectives and highlighting their reluctance to support the state's narrative. - Geleneksel-dindar insanlar (Traditional-religious people): Kütahyalı contrasts the attitudes of traditional-religious families with those of the LAST middle class, showing empathy towards their views on death and martyrdom. - İslami camia (Islamic community): He suggests that the Islamic community is rapidly secularizing, indicating a critical observation of societal changes. - Kemalist devlet zihniyeti (Kemalist state mentality): He critiques the Kemalist state mentality for slowing down the secularization process of the Islamic middle class, showing a critical stance towards this ideology.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that critiques the state's approach to the conflict in the Southeast, particularly the language used in reporting casualties. He emphasizes the human cost of the conflict and the moral implications of the state's rhetoric. - He also seems to be advocating for a deeper understanding of the societal dynamics, including the attitudes of different social groups towards death and the conflict. - There is a suggestion that he is critical of the alignment between certain state ideologies and the PKK, as well as the secularization of the Islamic community.

Trustworthiness: - The column is suggestive of a moderate level of trust. While Kütahyalı provides factual references and quotes, his strong opinions and emotional language may lead some readers to question his objectivity. However, his critique of the state's narrative and his call for a more nuanced understanding of societal dynamics could be seen as an attempt to foster a more balanced discussion.