Writer: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı
Source: Taraf
Title: Test title
Date: 2011-06-11

Traits: - Consistency: Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı's column shows a middle level of consistency. He maintains a clear stance against military intervention and in favor of the AK Party, but his emotional intensity varies, particularly when discussing Ahmet Altan's case and the broader political context. - Emotionality: Kütahyalı exhibits high emotionality, especially when discussing historical injustices and current political issues. His language is often provocative, as seen in his strong condemnation of military actions and support for the AK Party. - Credibility: Kütahyalı's column is a mix of fact-based reporting and hyperbolic statements. He references specific events and individuals, which adds a level of credibility, but his strong opinions and emotional appeals could be perceived as hyperbolic.

Affiliations: - AK Parti: Kütahyalı expresses strong support for the AK Party, suggesting that voting for them is crucial for ending military oversight. This indicates a possible positive affiliation with the party. - Ahmet Altan: There is a nuanced relationship with Ahmet Altan. Kütahyalı criticizes Altan for his legal battle with the Prime Minister but also acknowledges Altan's bravery and democratic stance, suggesting a complex but possibly positive personal view. - Başbakan (Prime Minister): Kütahyalı's interactions with the Prime Minister, including a live TV appearance and private conversation, suggest a possible direct or indirect affiliation or at least a working relationship. - BDP (Peace and Democracy Party): Kütahyalı expresses a negative view towards voting for BDP's independents, indicating a possible negative affiliation. - Hüseyin Gülerce: Kütahyalı quotes Gülerce positively, suggesting a possible positive affiliation or at least an alignment of views. - Taraf gazetesi (Taraf newspaper): Kütahyalı refers to Taraf as “our newspaper,” indicating a direct affiliation with the publication.

Public or Hidden Figures: - Kütahyalı mentions several historical and contemporary figures in a manner that suggests familiarity and possibly shared political views, such as Adnan Menderes, Abdi İpekçi, Uğur Mumcu, and Hrant Dink. These mentions indicate possible affiliations with their legacies or ideologies.

Agenda: - Kütahyalı appears to be pushing a narrative that supports the AK Party and opposes military intervention in politics. His call to vote for the AK Party is framed as a critical decision for the future of democracy in Turkey. - There is a strong emphasis on historical injustices and current political battles, which could be seen as an attempt to mobilize voters emotionally.

Trustworthiness: - Kütahyalı's column is highly opinionated and emotionally charged, which may affect its perceived trustworthiness. While he references specific events and individuals, the strong advocacy for one political party and the use of hyperbolic language suggest a moderate level of trust from an objective standpoint.